PRESS STATEMENT: Nubea Media Limited Secures Decisive County Court Victory

Nubea Media Limited Vindicated in Court: Legal Action Concludes with Dismissal of Counterclaims and Vital Protection of Nubea Media’s Intellectual Property

Nubea Media Limited, a leading disability founded, London-based business and coaching development company for Online Professionals and Entrepreneurs, announces the conclusion of legal proceedings initiated by the company at the Southampton County Court against former client Lynsey Turner, an alleged ADHD coach of Southampton, Dorset, who admitted to covertly recording disabled employees of the company covertly, refused to comply with Data Protection and made false statements to her bank for financial gain.

Following a comprehensive two day  hearing, the court dismissed Ms. Turner’s defense and entirely dismissed her counterclaim and her N244 application, against Nubea Media Limited. The judiciary upheld the legality, fairness, and integrity of Nubea Media’s business practices and contractual frameworks.

The Genesis of the Dispute

The matter arose after Lynsey Turner sought the professional services of Nubea Media Limited in January 2025, after her previous relationship with another Business Coach broke down. Upon receiving a bespoke, personalized business strategy plan, Ms. Turner made the following statement in discussing Nubea Media’s Flagship Business Coaching Program, The 365 Plan:  “As long as I do not copy you verbatim, there is nothing you can do.” This statement was made just days after Ms. Turner defaulted on her financial obligations to the company, necessitating formal debt recovery action.

Nubea Media considered statements of this nature to be a severe concern—not only to their own Intellectual Property but also to their wider community of creators and business owners. Nubea Media relied upon the legal doctrine of anticipatory breach, interpreting Ms. Turner’s statements as a statement which Nubea Media considered to amount to an anticipatory breach to violate the contractual protections surrounding the company’s proprietary assets. While Ms. Turner attempted to deny an intention of copying during the court hearing, Nubea Media successfully relied upon her previous statements made using the exact, transcribed video recording of Turner  in her final coaching session, before she was terminated by the company—a statement she ultimately admitted to making.

Following her initial statement, Nubea Media conducted a targeted investigation into Ms. Turner’s professional social media footprint. This audit revealed that she had actively concealed major business operations and affiliations with direct industry rivals— which Nubea Media says was inconsistent with her official company onboarding documentation, where she had carefully presented herself as an industry novice requiring help and guidance she concealed a CPD course she had completed months prior with Lisa Johnson, which Ms. Turner later stated to Nubea Media was “useless” for online business—the exact reason she initially gave when seeking the services of Nubea Media, months later.

Throughout the wider legal proceedings, Ms. Turner submitted numerous, different accounts to her bank, the court, and within her dismissed counterclaim, which Nubea Media says were inconsistent. This lack of consistency, combined with the database-backed digital evidence from Nubea Media’s digital portals, professional coaching logs, recorded coaching sessions, and financial systems, which formed part of the evidence before the court to reject her shifting positions, instead relying heavily on the objective records presented by Nubea Media. This included data from Kartra Digital Marketing Software, Stripe banking logs, and a source digital analysis of assets. 

Ultimately, this data, alongside over 400 pages of evidence, conclusively proved that Ms. Turner had misled her bank on two separate occasions to obtain two chargebacks by claiming she had not signed the Terms and Conditions, while intentionally concealing from her bank that she had signed terms and conditions and that she had been removed for an anticipatory breach of contract. Addressing Ms. Turner’s behavior at the hearing, the Judge explicitly stated:

“We prefer the evidence of Nubea Media and reject the defendant’s evidence of being a novice.”

In reality, Ms. Turner had explicitly accepted and signed the electronic terms at Nubea Media’s digital checkout—an action taken six months prior to her first chargeback attempt, and three months after she had already been provided with a full copy of her signed terms and conditions alongside other data she requested in a Subject Access Request (SAR).

Consequently, to protect its assets, its contractual integrity, and its network based on this anticipatory breach, Nubea Media removed Ms. Turner from both the Business and Coaching Development Program and their popular content membership, Contentpreneurs, with immediate effect.

Exactly six months and 10 days following her termination, Ms. Turner initiated her first chargeback with her banking institution by making inaccurate and misleading statements, claiming she had never been provided with the company’s Terms and Conditions, while intentionally withholding from them the fact that she had been terminated due to her anticipatory  breach. In court, Nubea Media decisively disproved this claim, demonstrating that Ms. Turner had been provided with the legal Terms and Conditions on five separate occasions before attempting the retrospective banking chargeback. This evidence included a complete Subject Access Request (SAR) fulfilled by Nubea Media three months before Ms. Turner proceeded to make two distinct chargebacks backed by statements which Nubea Media says were false, to her bank. The Judge stated they preferred Nubea Media’s evidence.

The Judge also noted that given Ms. Turner’s previous professional experience working for major corporate entities such as Zurich Insurance, she knew or ought to have known that it was unlawful to make false declarations to her banking institution. The court emphasized that whether or not she read the terms and conditions, she did tick the agreement box before making payment, and was given those terms and conditions in total five separate times before falsely informing her bank that she had not.

Corporate Integrity and Accountability

As a disabled-run organization that proudly serves many clients navigating disabilities and chronic health conditions, Nubea Media operates under a strict mission statement rooted in trust, honesty, and unwavering integrity. For existing clients and those unfamiliar with the company, these values are non-negotiable pillars required to maintain a safe, accessible, and supportive environment for the disabled community.

Following her immediate termination, Ms. Turner, alongside anti-bullying campaigner Lisa Johnson, published online commentary that misrepresented the facts of the situation to an audience of over 6,000 online business owners within one of Ms. Johnson’s Facebook groups. Throughout this public campaign, Ms.Turner did not disclose the fact that she had been terminated by Nubea Media due to her explicit statements and the company’s reliance on an anticipatory breach of contract regarding Intellectual Property protection.

Instead, Ms. Turner presented herself as a victim of foul play, going so far as to publicly target the Director of Nubea Media with statements which Nubea Media considers defamatory—while publicly thanking Lisa Johnson for her support and supposed “knowledge” in the matter. Nubea Media states that up until this point, Lisa Johnson was completely unknown to the company. As Nubea Media is actively addressing these matters of defamation through appropriate legal channels, the company will make no further comment on these statements at this time.

Furthermore, Ms. Turner actively declared to the members of the Facebook group, “let’s fight her,” an escalation Nubea Media considers as directly inciting a potential commercial attack on the company and their disabled Director.

During the litigation, Nubea Media was surprised to learn that Lisa Johnson, a former business coach of Lynsey Turner, had launched a product identical in name to the exact product Ms. Turner had purchased from Nubea Media. Moving firmly to protect its proprietary assets, Nubea Media took formal action after request to remove it from sale by Nubea Media were ignored by Lisa Johnson, resulting in Google removing two separate webpages operated by Lisa Johnson due to copyright infringement of Intellectual Property owned by Nubea Media. An action permanently archived in the public Lumen Database.

When formally notified of the breach by Google, Ms. Johnson shrugged off the legal enforcement in public social media posts. She first stated to her followers that she could simply place her own name in front of the material and “that will be ok,” before later attempting to minimize the copyright violations entirely—deflecting the narrative by falsely painting Nubea Media’s legitimate legal protections as a trivial dispute over marketing outfits and social media “drama.” Nubea Media views this continuous public narrative as a conduct which Nubea Media considers inappropriate from an individual who purports to coach other business owners on corporate ethics, whilst professing to be an anti-bullying ambassador. At this point we make no further comment, whilst we examine other surrounding issues relating to Miss Johnsons conduct. 

Nubea Media considered Ms. Turner’s comments and actions wholly disproportionate to her own anticipatory breach of contract. Faced with an aggressive online narrative alongside numerous malicious, misrepresentative, and unfounded complaints lodged by Ms. Turner to third parties—which continued persistently for a period of approximately six months—Nubea Media was left with no other alternative to protect its team, its reputation, and its corporate operations but to initiate formal legal proceedings against Ms. Turner, having entirely exhausted all other available avenues.

Key Admissions and Judicial Findings

During the live court hearing itself, the following evidence was heard by the court:

• Admission of Intent: Ms. Turner admitted under oath to the Judge that she did state there was “nothing [Nubea Media] could do” so long as she did not copy the Intellectual Property verbatim.
• Covert Recording & Data Violations: Ms. Turner admitted to covertly recording both a disabled representative of Nubea Media during telephone conversations and online meetings, as well as a disabled employee of the company, without consent. Following this, she actively refused to comply with standard data protection rules and formal Subject Access Requests (SARs) on two separate occasions when requested, despite relying on her own data requests during the dispute. The sitting Judge noted these covert recordings and data violations as a significant point of concern during the hearing.
• Evidence of Satisfaction before Termination: Evidence showed Ms. Turner had repeatedly praised the program in writing prior to her termination, formed part of the evidence before the Court “This is exactly what I have been searching for.”
• Lynsey Turner had been provided with Terms and conditions on five different occasions prior to making chargebacks to her bank, including a Subject data Access request, whilst informing her bank that she did not. 

These actions directly informed the court’s final rejection of Ms. Turner’s attempts to present herself as an inexperienced beginner. It was revealed that Ms. Turner did not disclose her extensive, ongoing business activities, which included her active involvement in a franchise known as The Sisterhood Marketing Group (also operating as The Sisterhood Networking Group), her status as an affiliate for a direct competitor, and her prior completion of a business course with Lisa Johnson.

In her defense, which was ultimately dismissed, Ms. Turner alleged that Nubea Media’s Terms and Conditions and Intellectual Property licensing were unlawful, primarily objecting to the fact that the contract prevented her from commercializing Nubea Media’s proprietary material.

The Judge rejected this defense entirely, explicitly stating that Nubea Media’s terms are lawful and correct. The court further noted the stark contradiction in her defense given that no complaints were raised prior to termination by Nubea Media when Ms. Turner specifically visited the company’s Intellectual Property Policies and Terms and Conditions page 21 separate times on March 19th, 2025.

The court affirmed that Nubea Media’s licenses are standard, normal, and legally sound for the industry, serving the legitimate purpose of protecting the company’s Intellectual Property. Crucially, the court confirmed that Nubea Media’s licensing terms were not restrictive, as claimed by Lynsey Turner, and strictly do not permit Ms. Turner to exploit, commercialize, resell, or reproduce the company’s Intellectual Property, upholding the validity of the full terms. The Judge remarked on the clear inconsistency in Ms. Turner’s behavior—noting that she praised the program and raised zero complaints while receiving services, only attempting to target the legal framework of Nubea Media (managed by AG Law Services) after her undisclosed corporate activities and statements about copying resulted in her justified termination.

Crucially, the Judge explicitly ruled that Nubea Media’s services were not misrepresented in any way, completely dismissing Ms. Turner’s claims to the contrary after she had spent months praising them. The court further declared that the defendant was not entitled to retain or claw back any payments made to Nubea Media, nor was she entitled to claim costs.

On a strict interpretation of the contractual mechanics, the court noted that because Nubea Media had already moved to terminate the defendant’s access, the contractual relationship had already concluded. While the Judge noted that a suspicion of an intent to copy was technically insufficient to declare a formal breach at the exact moment of termination, the court’s final ruling focused heavily on the financial reality of the case and the documented misrepresentations made by Lynsey Turner. As this proceeding was fundamentally a financial recovery action regarding the contested chargebacks, the Judge explicitly ruled that the defendant was not entitled to claw back, retain, or receive a refund for any payments made to Nubea Media.  Nubea Media stands firmly by its swift operational decision to intervene based on an anticipatory breach, which ultimately achieved its exact purpose: protecting the company’s revenue, securing its proprietary assets, and successfully defeating the defendant’s monetary claims.

Proactive Regulatory Measures

Due to the repeated non-disclosures made by Ms. Turner, her covert recording of disabled representatives and employees of the company, and her complete failure to adhere to data protection laws, Nubea Media is treating her conduct with the utmost seriousness. Because Ms. Turner actively markets and operates herself as a wellness coach in the Southampton and Dorset regions, Nubea Media has formally reported her conduct to the Police. Furthermore, the company has officially raised its concerns with the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) regarding her eligibility to work with ill, disabled, or otherwise vulnerable individuals, alongside filing a formal complaint with the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) for her explicit failures to adhere to standard data protection and GDPR protocols involving disabled persons whilst relying on those legalities herself.

Moving Forward

Nubea Media Limited has issued this statement to correct the public record following months of misleading commentary.

“It does not matter how big or small your business is; every enterprise should be built upon honest ethics and clean business practices,” said a spokesperson for Nubea Media. “While we note the court’s feedback regarding the exact timing of our contractual termination, we make no apologies for our actions. When our Intellectual Property—and by extension, the security and physical safety of our client community and team—is directly threatened, we will always choose protection over profit. We will immediately terminate anyone who threatens the IP of our business, our clients, or their safety, or attempts to manipulate our policies or our terms, whether that is attempted directly or via third parties. We are incredibly pleased that the court has fully validated our practices and our contracts.”

If any of our former or current clients have been approached by this individual, or third parties connected to this matter, and have any concerns regarding the false or misleading narrative Turner and her associates has publicly and privately spun—or if you have been left upset or unsettled by any unsolicited contact from her—we invite you to get in touch with us directly via your official onboarding email channel.